The effects of cash transfers on adult and child mortality in low- and middle-income countries.

Poverty is an important social determinant of health that is associated with increased risk of death1-5. Cash transfer programmes provide non-contributory monetary transfers to individuals or households, with or without behavioural conditions such as children's school attendance6,7. Over recent decades, cash transfer programmes have emerged as central components of poverty reduction strategies of many governments in low- and middle-income countries6,7. The effects of these programmes on adult and child mortality rates remains an important gap in the literature, however, with existing evidence limited to a few specific conditional cash transfer programmes, primarily in Latin America8-14. Here we evaluated the effects of large-scale, government-led cash transfer programmes on all-cause adult and child mortality using individual-level longitudinal mortality datasets from many low- and middle-income countries. We found that cash transfer programmes were associated with significant reductions in mortality among children under five years of age and women. Secondary heterogeneity analyses suggested similar effects for conditional and unconditional programmes, and larger effects for programmes that covered a larger share of the population and provided larger transfer amounts, and in countries with lower health expenditures, lower baseline life expectancy, and higher perceived regulatory quality. Our findings support the use of anti-poverty programmes such as cash transfers, which many countries have introduced or expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, to improve population health.

Quality improvement initiative reduces overcrowding on labour and delivery unit in a university hospital in Haiti.

BACKGROUND: Following the first COVID-19 peak in 2020, came the seasonal childbirth peak at Hôpital Universitaire de Mirebalais (HUM). This peak is associated with overcrowding on the labour and delivery (L&D) ward. Lack of sufficient bed-space for sick neonates in the neonatal ICU at HUM, has led to overcrowding and lengthy stays of sick newborns on L&D. These conditions contribute to the subsequent lack of bed-space for newly postpartum mothers and potentially decreases quality of care for both new mothers and neonates. METHODS: A Maternity Task Force was created by hospital leadership to address these urgent needs. The team's objective was to eliminate mothers and newborns laying on the floor in L&D. The Six-Sigma/DMAIC quality improvement methodology was used as the problem was urgent, demanded rapid results and centred around the process of patient flow in the institution. Process flow chart and Ishikawa diagrams were used to identify the root causes of the issues. RESULTS: An average of 22% of postpartum women did not have a bed preintervention and 0% of postpartum women were laying on the floor post intervention. An average of 33% of newborns received paediatric care on the maternity ward pre-intervention compared with an average of 17% postintervention. The team did not achieve its objective for this second indicator, which was to have less than 10% of sick newborns on the maternity ward receiving paediatric care. CONCLUSION: HUM hospital leadership took the vital decision to form the Maternity Task Force to make changes, which consequently led to a sustainable positive and lasting impact on the lives of new mothers and their babies at the institution. The objective of 0 postpartum mothers and newborns on the ground was achieved and fewer newborns receive intensive paediatric care on the maternity ward as a result of our interventions.